看完这个电影眼中反复出现一个场景，
一个女人，在酒吧里的某个台子上，受尽凌辱，心理除了要死的冲动之外，满眼晃悠的是一群喝着酒抽着烟红着眼的男人，一边在欢呼自己的耻辱，一边在各自狂欢……
每个人都有权力为自己伸张正义，却不是每个人都会得到别人的同情。
因为那帮混混们是所谓的“法学院大学生，有着大好前程，而一个会在酒吧里瞎玩招蜂引蝶的女人一定不是个好女人”的理由，女主角的辩护律师选择了向“保护优质群体”妥协，没有任何人愿意作证，没有任何人愿意说这不是故意伤害而是强奸……
律师说坏人已经受到惩罚了，你放弃吧，量刑是一样的，何必呢？
男朋友说你现在心里变态，像怨妇一般，丢的人还不够多么？还要一遍遍的法庭上重申自己的丑事么？？

这是1988年的电影，在美国发生的故事。其实这样的故事在我们身边有很多很多。最近谷歌事件沸沸扬扬，多少有志青年大呼愚民政策让我们犹如井底之蛙，大呼要言论自由。其实换个悲观的角度想想，当你什么都知道，什么都清楚却什么都没法解释的时候岂不是更可悲。青蛙是从井底跳出来了

「Ladies and Gentleman, Mr. Paulson has told you the testimony of Sarah Tobias is nothing. Sarah Tobias was raped but that is nothing. She was cut, and bruised, and terrorized, but that is nothing. All of it happened in front of a howling crowd and that is nothing. Well, it may be nothing to Mr. Paulson, but it is not nothing to Sarah Tobias and I don't believe it's nothing to you. Next, Mr. Paulson tried to convince you that Kenneth Joyce was the only person in that room who knew that Sarah Tobias was being raped. The only one. Now you watched Kenneth Joyce, how did he strike you? Did he seem especially sensitive? Especially observant? Did he seem so remarkable that you immediately said to yourselves, "Of course. This man would notice things other people wouldn't." Do you believe that Kenneth Joyce saw something those three man didn't see? In all the time that Sarah Tobias was held d

“暴劫梨花”口碑经典的剧情片 The Accused---罪与罚
转载请注明网址: https://www.hfthsc.com/voddetail/19910.html